{
  "schema_version": "f117a-p08-record-exports-1",
  "snapshot_at": "2026-10-11",
  "release": "F117A-P08-STATIC-RECORDS-R1",
  "records": [
    {
      "id": "rec_us_senate_119_2_00234",
      "slug": "senate-roll-call-234-clarity-cloture",
      "type": "roll_call_vote",
      "title": "Senate roll call 234: CLARITY Act procedural cloture vote",
      "summary": "On September 15, 2026, the Senate rejected cloture on a motion to proceed to H.R. 3633 by 49–50, with one senator not voting.",
      "event_date": "2026-09-15",
      "institution": "United States Senate",
      "jurisdiction": "federal",
      "chamber": "Senate",
      "congress": 119,
      "session": 2,
      "measure_id": "119-hr-3633",
      "procedural_type": "cloture_on_motion_to_proceed",
      "status": "rejected_procedural_motion",
      "official_action": "On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_senate_119_2_00234"
      ],
      "actor_person_ids": [],
      "related_person_ids": [],
      "related_publication_slugs": [
        "lummis-clarity-act-compliance-officers-september-cloture"
      ],
      "linked_record_ids": [
        "rec_119_hr3633_eh",
        "rec_119_s3755_rs"
      ],
      "rollcall_id": "vote_us_senate_119_2_00234",
      "limits": [
        "A 49–50 procedural cloture rejection does not itself defeat the underlying bill in a final passage vote.",
        "The roll call cannot demonstrate votes on individual compliance-officer language or individual senators’ motivations."
      ],
      "document_note": "Individual senators’ positions are indexed from the Senate clerk’s alphabetical list; source role and office recorded as of vote date."
    },
    {
      "id": "rec_119_hr3633_eh",
      "slug": "hr-3633-2025-house-engrossed",
      "type": "bill_version",
      "title": "H.R. 3633 — House-engrossed CLARITY Act text",
      "summary": "The GPO version of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act records the H.R. 3633 text engrossed in the House on July 17, 2025.",
      "event_date": "2025-07-17",
      "institution": "U.S. Congress / Government Publishing Office",
      "jurisdiction": "federal",
      "chamber": "House",
      "congress": 119,
      "session": 1,
      "measure_id": "119-hr-3633",
      "version_code": "EH",
      "status": "engrossed_in_house",
      "official_action": "Engrossed in House (published text version)",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_gpo_hr3633_eh",
        "src_senate_119_2_00234"
      ],
      "actor_person_ids": [],
      "related_person_ids": [],
      "related_publication_slugs": [
        "lummis-clarity-act-compliance-officers-september-cloture"
      ],
      "linked_record_ids": [
        "rec_us_senate_119_2_00234",
        "rec_119_s3755_rs"
      ],
      "limits": [
        "The EH version is a document version; it is not an enacted federal statute.",
        "The related Senate roll call was a motion to invoke cloture on taking up H.R. 3633, not a vote on all its clauses."
      ],
      "document_note": "This is a separate bill number from S. 3755; do not collapse House and Senate text versions."
    },
    {
      "id": "rec_119_s3755_rs",
      "slug": "s-3755-2026-senate-reported",
      "type": "bill_version",
      "title": "S. 3755 — Senate-reported digital commodity proposal",
      "summary": "On February 2, 2026, Senate Agriculture reported S. 3755, a distinct proposal concerning Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulation.",
      "event_date": "2026-02-02",
      "institution": "U.S. Senate / Government Publishing Office",
      "jurisdiction": "federal",
      "chamber": "Senate",
      "congress": 119,
      "session": 2,
      "measure_id": "119-s-3755",
      "version_code": "RS",
      "status": "reported_in_senate",
      "official_action": "Reported by Senate Agriculture Committee and placed on the calendar",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_gpo_s3755_rs"
      ],
      "actor_person_ids": [
        "per_john_boozman_f8821b7"
      ],
      "related_person_ids": [],
      "related_publication_slugs": [
        "lummis-clarity-act-compliance-officers-september-cloture"
      ],
      "linked_record_ids": [
        "rec_119_hr3633_eh"
      ],
      "limits": [
        "Reported bill text is not enacted law.",
        "S. 3755 is not H.R. 3633, and the source does not show passage of a particular compliance-officer amendment."
      ],
      "document_note": "John Boozman appears in the source as reporter from Senate Agriculture; this is not evidence that another senator cast a vote on this text."
    },
    {
      "id": "rec_119_s5493_is",
      "slug": "s-5493-2026-ai-bill-introduction",
      "type": "bill_version",
      "title": "S. 5493 — Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act introduced",
      "summary": "Senator Bernie Sanders introduced S. 5493 on September 23, 2026; it was read twice and referred to the Senate Commerce Committee.",
      "event_date": "2026-09-23",
      "institution": "U.S. Senate / Government Publishing Office",
      "jurisdiction": "federal",
      "chamber": "Senate",
      "congress": 119,
      "session": 2,
      "measure_id": "119-s-5493",
      "version_code": "IS",
      "status": "introduced_and_referred",
      "official_action": "Introduced in Senate; read twice; referred to Commerce, Science, and Transportation",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_gpo_s5493_is"
      ],
      "actor_person_ids": [
        "per_bernie_sanders_94f3e08"
      ],
      "related_person_ids": [],
      "related_publication_slugs": [
        "sanders-ai-agent-incidents-ceo-liability-pause-evidence"
      ],
      "linked_record_ids": [],
      "limits": [
        "This is introduced legislative text, not an enacted law.",
        "Section 8’s proposed pause is framed as operating if the bill were enacted, not as a present nationwide ban."
      ],
      "document_note": "The official GPO bill text and legislative heading were read; no later disposition is asserted beyond this dated record."
    },
    {
      "id": "rec_sjc_2026_09_29",
      "slug": "judiciary-jack-smith-hearing-september-2026",
      "type": "oversight_hearing",
      "title": "Judiciary hearing — Jack Smith oversight, September 29",
      "summary": "The Senate Judiciary Committee held a full-committee hearing listing former Special Counsel Jack Smith as a witness on September 29, 2026.",
      "event_date": "2026-09-29",
      "institution": "U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary",
      "jurisdiction": "federal",
      "chamber": "Senate",
      "status": "hearing_listed_and_held",
      "official_action": "Full committee hearing",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_sjc_hearing_2026_09_29",
        "src_sjc_grassley_2026_09_29"
      ],
      "actor_person_ids": [
        "per_chuck_grassley_6cee6e8"
      ],
      "related_person_ids": [],
      "related_publication_slugs": [
        "grassley-arctic-frost-democrats-oversight-public-record",
        "klobuchar-schmitt-smith-hawks-hawkeyes-hearing-evidence"
      ],
      "linked_record_ids": [
        "rec_sjc_2026_02_10"
      ],
      "limits": [
        "A hearing listing verifies proceeding, witness and date; it does not adjudicate accusations.",
        "Chairman Grassley’s official prepared remarks are attributable advocacy and not judicial findings."
      ],
      "document_note": "Grassley is linked because of his published opening statement as committee chair; the nonpolitician witness is not given a senator ID."
    },
    {
      "id": "rec_sjc_2026_02_10",
      "slug": "judiciary-arctic-frost-telecom-hearing-february-2026",
      "type": "oversight_hearing",
      "title": "Judiciary subcommittee — telecommunications / Arctic Frost",
      "summary": "The Judiciary subcommittee hearing of February 10, 2026 listed telecommunications legal officers and other witnesses on the committee page.",
      "event_date": "2026-02-10",
      "institution": "U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary",
      "jurisdiction": "federal",
      "chamber": "Senate",
      "status": "hearing_listed_and_held",
      "official_action": "Subcommittee hearing",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_sjc_hearing_2026_02_10"
      ],
      "actor_person_ids": [],
      "related_person_ids": [],
      "related_publication_slugs": [
        "grassley-arctic-frost-democrats-oversight-public-record"
      ],
      "linked_record_ids": [
        "rec_sjc_2026_09_29"
      ],
      "limits": [
        "The hearing roster and testimony links do not mean the concerns raised have been adjudicated.",
        "Listed private witnesses are not officeholders in the 150-profile directory."
      ],
      "document_note": "Topic-only link to Grassley investigation is contextual, not an authored statement or an allegation assigned to an officeholder."
    },
    {
      "id": "rec_ftc_exxon_2025_01",
      "slug": "ftc-exxon-pioneer-january-order-2025",
      "type": "agency_order",
      "title": "FTC January 2025 final Exxon–Pioneer consent order",
      "summary": "On January 17, 2025, the FTC entered a final consent order imposing Exxon board and related restrictions; the agency later set it aside.",
      "event_date": "2025-01-17",
      "institution": "Federal Trade Commission",
      "jurisdiction": "federal",
      "chamber": null,
      "status": "superseded_order",
      "official_action": "Final consent order entered (later set aside)",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_ftc_exxon_2025_01_17",
        "src_ftc_exxon_2025_07_17"
      ],
      "actor_person_ids": [],
      "related_person_ids": [],
      "related_publication_slugs": [
        "kennedy-inflation-biden-pandemic-iran-hormuz-evidence"
      ],
      "linked_record_ids": [
        "rec_ftc_exxon_2025_07"
      ],
      "limits": [
        "A final consent order settling an administrative matter did not establish individual criminal guilt.",
        "This January order was set aside in July 2025: it must not be presented as operative today."
      ],
      "document_note": "Administrative history is linked to the Kennedy investigation as context, not as an action by Senator Kennedy."
    },
    {
      "id": "rec_ftc_exxon_2025_07",
      "slug": "ftc-exxon-pioneer-set-aside-july-2025",
      "type": "agency_order",
      "title": "FTC July 2025 reverses Exxon–Pioneer final order",
      "summary": "On July 17, 2025 the FTC reopened and set aside its January 2025 Exxon–Pioneer consent order by a 3–0 Commission vote.",
      "event_date": "2025-07-17",
      "institution": "Federal Trade Commission",
      "jurisdiction": "federal",
      "chamber": null,
      "status": "order_set_aside",
      "official_action": "Commission reopened and set aside prior final consent order",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_ftc_exxon_2025_07_17",
        "src_ftc_exxon_docket",
        "src_ftc_exxon_2025_01_17"
      ],
      "actor_person_ids": [],
      "related_person_ids": [],
      "related_publication_slugs": [
        "kennedy-inflation-biden-pandemic-iran-hormuz-evidence"
      ],
      "linked_record_ids": [
        "rec_ftc_exxon_2025_01"
      ],
      "limits": [
        "The order was formally set aside; this does not necessarily adjudicate every historical allegation in the original complaint.",
        "This is an FTC action by commissioners and agency, not a U.S. Senate roll-call vote."
      ],
      "document_note": "The published FTC docket lists case C-4815 closed; do not reassign agency responsibility to a politician mentioned in a related article."
    },
    {
      "id": "rec_eo_14409_2026_06_02",
      "slug": "executive-order-14409-ai-cybersecurity-2026",
      "type": "executive_action",
      "title": "Executive Order 14409 — AI innovation and cybersecurity",
      "summary": "On June 2, 2026, the President directed federal AI cybersecurity coordination and prioritized existing computer-crime law enforcement; the order disclaims compulsory licensing of new AI models.",
      "event_date": "2026-06-02",
      "institution": "Executive Office of the President",
      "jurisdiction": "federal",
      "chamber": null,
      "status": "executive_order_signed",
      "official_action": "Executive Order 14409 signed: cybersecurity and voluntary frontier-model framework directives",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_whitehouse_eo14409"
      ],
      "actor_person_ids": [],
      "related_person_ids": [],
      "related_publication_slugs": [
        "sanders-ai-agent-incidents-ceo-liability-pause-evidence"
      ],
      "linked_record_ids": [
        "rec_eo_14434_2026_09_29",
        "rec_119_s5493_is"
      ],
      "limits": [
        "The order prioritizes enforcement under existing criminal statutes. It does not itself establish a novel personal felony for AI executives or declare an individual guilty.",
        "Its frontier-model access framework is explicitly voluntary and is not a mandatory government model licensing or preclearance scheme.",
        "Presidential directions and deadlines cannot be treated as proof every agency actually implemented them."
      ],
      "document_note": "Original White House order, Sections 3(c), 4 and 5. Specific references are 18 U.S.C. 1028, 1030 and 1343; prosecutions still require the statutory elements and facts."
    },
    {
      "id": "rec_eo_14434_2026_09_29",
      "slug": "executive-order-14434-ai-terminology-2026",
      "type": "executive_action",
      "title": "Executive Order 14434 — executive-branch AI terminology",
      "summary": "The September 29, 2026 order directs agencies, to the maximum extent permitted by law, to use “Super Intelligence” instead of “Artificial Intelligence” in certain non-statutory executive documents and requests a legislative-definition proposal.",
      "event_date": "2026-09-29",
      "institution": "Executive Office of the President",
      "jurisdiction": "federal",
      "chamber": null,
      "status": "executive_order_signed",
      "official_action": "Executive Order 14434 signed: executive terminology direction and proposed statutory-definition follow-up",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_whitehouse_eo14434"
      ],
      "actor_person_ids": [],
      "related_person_ids": [],
      "related_publication_slugs": [
        "sanders-ai-agent-incidents-ceo-liability-pause-evidence"
      ],
      "linked_record_ids": [
        "rec_eo_14409_2026_06_02"
      ],
      "limits": [
        "The non-statutory terminology direction does not rewrite existing acts of Congress, prior regulations, contracts or prior presidential actions.",
        "The order calls for proposed legislative language; a proposed congressional definition is not an enacted amendment.",
        "The order uses the existing statutory AI definition for its own purposes and does not prove the existence of any separately defined artificial superintelligence system."
      ],
      "document_note": "Original White House Executive Order 14434 Sections 2(a)-(b) and 3(a)-(b). No attribution is made to a senator merely named in companion AI reporting."
    }
  ]
}